Author: Gloria St. Martin-Lowry

Let’s talk about probationary periods. You know, that arbitrary timeframe companies slap onto new hires to “evaluate” them before fully committing. As if the months of recruiting, interviewing, and vetting weren’t enough. Because clearly, after all that, we’re still not sure about them?  Yet, we are immediately expecting their commitment and loyalty.

Seriously, if you’re hiring people you don’t trust from day one, what does that say about your hiring process? Either you don’t know how to hire, or you’re hedging your bets like a gambler at a Vegas roulette table. And let’s be real, neither of those are a good look.

Probation = We Don’t Fully Trust You

Nothing says, “welcome to the team” quite like, “Hey, you’re on probation, so don’t screw up!” That’s the message companies send, whether they realize it or not. Instead of empowering new employees and setting them up for success, probationary periods create an immediate sense of insecurity and maybe even paranoia in today’s world.

And let’s talk about that word: probation. The only other people in society on probation are criminals. Think about that for a second. We’re lumping new hires—talented, eager responsible adults—into the same category as individuals who have literally broken the law. What kind of message is that? You’re telling new employees from the get-go that they are not trusted, that they must “prove” their worth, and that they can be easily discarded. That’s a ridiculous way to build loyalty, commitment, and high performance.

It’s a Cop-Out for Leaders

Probationary periods give managers an easy out. Instead of actively coaching, guiding, and integrating new employees, leaders can just sit back and think, “Well, let’s see if they make it through probation.” That’s not leadership. That’s avoidance.

A leader’s job is to develop people, not wait for them to magically prove their worth. If a new employee is struggling, the right response is mentorship—not crossing your arms and waiting to see if they “sink or swim” because you can use the probationary period as an easy out.

It Undermines Culture and Performance

You can’t build a high-performing culture when people feel like they’re on shaky ground from day one. The best companies create an environment where employees feel valued, supported, and confident in their contributions. Probationary periods achieve the exact opposite—they breed hesitation, risk aversion, and a reluctance to take initiative.

Want innovation? Want accountability? Want high performance? Then start by treating people like trusted adults from the moment they walk through the door. It’s not that hard.

Real-World Consequences

At HPWP Group (High Performance Work Place), we’ve been advocating for the elimination of probationary periods for 30 years.  But now, there are real world consequences.

Look no further than recent headlines to see the damage probationary periods can inflict. The Trump administration, in a misguided attempt to “streamline” government operations, has been on a firing spree, targeting probationary employees across various federal agencies. Thousands of dedicated workers have been shown the door, often without legitimate cause, simply because their probationary status makes them easy targets.

At the National Park Service, for instance, nearly 2,000 job offers for seasonal workers were rescinded, and many recently hired probationary employees were terminated. This has led to severe understaffing, threatening the maintenance and operation of our cherished national parks.

These aren’t just statistics; they’re real people whose livelihoods have been upended. The misuse of probationary periods as a tool for indiscriminate layoffs not only devastates employees but also cripples the very institutions they’re meant to serve.

Stop the Nonsense

Here’s a radical idea: If you don’t trust someone enough to hire them outright, don’t hire them. But if you do hire them, treat them like a full-fledged, capable member of your team—because that’s exactly what they are. Ditch the probationary periods and start leading like you mean it.

Rant over.

Meta, Doge, and the Cold Truth of Corporate Layoffs

It’s infuriating (yes, I said it) to watch companies treat layoffs like a numbers game, tossing around corporate speak and touting shareholder value while completely disregarding the human impact. Giants like Meta—and yes, even the so-called innovators at DOGE—have shown an astonishing lack of care or empathy when it comes to letting go of employees.

A Cold, Calculated Business Decision

Every time a company announces a round of layoffs, it’s a brutal reminder of how little they value the people who helped build their success. Meta’s recent approach to downsizing wasn’t just a business decision; it was a master class in corporate coldness.  Despite the fact that share price is up 47% over the past year and revenue is up 21% in the last quarter, it’s CEO says they are preparing for an “intense year” and a reduction of more than 3,000 people is necessary.

Employees found themselves in the lurch with little warning. And if that wasn’t enough, just one week after announcing the layoffs, Meta revised the bonus payout for its executives – up to 200% from 75%. I guess the good news is at least they value some people.

Meanwhile, DOGE isn’t far behind in this mismanagement marathon—poor planning and impersonal communications, contribute to a process that reeks of corporate callousness.  Musk had the Office of Personnel Management issue an email (on Saturday) asking “What did you do last week?”.  The expectation was that people would respond with five bullet points by Monday. Apparently, this was a true test to see if people would check their emails on the weekend.  Musk defended the email demand saying it was “basically a check to see if the employee had a pulse and was capable of replying to an email,” adding “Lot of people in for a rude awakening and a strong dose of reality.  They don’t get it yet, but they will.”  Nice, right?  It’s no surprise the back pedaling has started.

The Lasting Impact

Poorly handled layoffs—like those witnessed at Meta and Doge—wreak havoc on both individuals and the business as a whole. Instead of a respectful and transparent process, these companies opted for a cold, impersonal approach that leaves employees feeling abandoned and betrayed, with their livelihoods and self-worth trampled in the name of cost-cutting.

What gets lost in all the headlines is the real impact of these layoffs. It’s not just about severance packages and exit interviews—it’s the emotional, financial, and social toll on individuals who dedicated themselves to their work. When leaders view layoffs merely as a cost-cutting exercise, they’re ignoring the long-term damage to their brand and, more importantly, the trust and morale of their remaining employees. This isn’t just an HR issue; it’s a fundamental failure in leadership and accountability.

It Doesn’t Have to be This Way

Why are we waiting until the situation is dire or urgent before we address it?  We can be more proactive and involve our team in driving innovation to grow our business, streamlining processes and improving efficiencies (minimizing the need for layoffs).  Check out our article Navigating Layoffs: The True Cost to Business published in HR Director for more insights.